Inbox

Jul. 15th, 2024 12:07 pm
artistinexile: (ascendancy 2)
[personal profile] artistinexile
You have reached the inbox of the former Grand Admiral Thrawn of the Imperial Star Destroyer Chimaera and the Seventh Fleet, also formerly known as Senior Commander Mitth'raw'nuruodo of the Springhawk.

I will return your message promptly.

[The message repeats in six different languages]

Date: 2025-04-01 01:32 am (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Reminisce)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
Setting aside whether I trust the admiral (I don't and I'm happy to elaborate but that's way outside our scope), I agree that you describe the system quite accurately. Regardless of whether one should trust the admiral and the warden, the fact of the matter is that power *is* vested in the warden. It would be a waste of time for Arthur or whoever if the warden asked the admiral to make you stop using your communicator, for the simple reason that the Admiral will only listen to the warden in question!

I would happy to know the author, but I don't intend to uncover the author. I would be happy to have an in depth conversation with any inmate who sincerely believes the bill of rights will be helpful! I'd go to whoever said any such thing first.

Would the possibility of this "improper" meddling be bothersome enough for you to oppose the bill that would make it more commonplace?

Date: 2025-04-03 06:48 pm (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Or)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
Do you want it?

I'll admit you and I may have incompatible long-term goals. But in the short-term, seeing this bill rebuked would be quite satisfying.

Date: 2025-04-04 03:57 am (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Banter)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
Can't say you're wrong about that either.

What would satisfy you?

Actually, more interesting question. Have you blown up a planet?

Date: 2025-04-04 04:17 am (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Ahoy)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
Obviously such a question would be the definition of sensitive in nature. But I was just curious. It seems that magnitude of crime is inversely correlated with time until graduation. I was surprised to hear how high up that scale could go, and when you talked of governments, it occurred to me that you might fall into the reference class. Haven't really gotten to pick anyone's brain about it yet.

Apologies if that was a stereotype.
Edited (Definition OF sensitive in nature) Date: 2025-04-04 04:36 am (UTC)

Date: 2025-04-04 05:00 am (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Or)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
No. But I'm given to understand that multiple past graduates have.

Date: 2025-04-04 05:09 am (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Manic)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
[OMG??????????]

That's certainly your prerogative, then.





[OMG???????????????]